The Official Blog of the Dallas Association of Law Librarians (DALL), a chapter of the American Association of Law Libraries.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
ABA Formal Opinion 483. Lawyers’ Obligations After an Electronic Data Breach or Cyberattack
Under the Duty of Competence the lawyer has an obligation to monitor for a data breach, stop the breach and restore systems, and determine what occurred.
There are five factors guiding the lawyer in the duty of confidentiality: the sensitivity of the information, the likelihood of disclosure if additional safeguards are not employed, the cost of employing additional safeguards, the difficulty of implementing the safeguards, and the extent to which the safeguards adversely affect the lawyers' ability to represent clients.
The lawyers' obligations to provide notice of data breach are spelled out for current and former clients.
Breach notification requirements address the type of breach, the sufficiency of disclosure to allow the client to make an informed decision, and as a best practice the lawyer should inform the client of the plan to respond to the data breach.
Should PII, or personally identifiable information be compromised, the lawyer should evaluate the obligations under state and federal law.
Formal Opinion 483 relies upon Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, 1.6, 5.1 and 5.3 and Formal Opinion 477R (Securing Communication of Protected Client Information).
A copy of Formal Opinion 483 may be accessed from the ABA.
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/aba_formal_op_483.pdf
A listing of state security breach notification laws may be accessed from the National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/security-breach-notification-laws.aspx
The Texas state laws affecting data breach may be accessed in the Texas Business & Commerce Code at §§ 521.002, 521.053
Friday, January 04, 2013
How to Conduct FREE Legal Research Online: A FREE CLE Program in Dallas
2. Understanding of the organization, structure, content, and search strategies to perform time‐saving legal research in Congress.gov and THOMAS and other free legal databases from your own computer wherever you are in the world; and
by the Law Library of Congress as well as other authoritative Web‐based collections and useful search engines.
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Tuesday, May 01, 2012
Monday, April 30, 2012
Monday, April 02, 2012
60 Apps in 60 Minutes 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
ABA Free Legal Research Training Session in New Orleans, LA
ABA Standing Committee on the Law Library of Congress Offers Free Training Session on How to Conduct Free Legal Research Online in NOLA Next Month
Hat tip to Amy E. Horton-Newell, Director, ABA Standing Committee on the Law Library of Congress for calling this interesting education and professional development opportunity to my attention.
The American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Law Library of Congress will host a free training program on how to conduct free legal research online at the Royal Sonesta Hotel in New Orleans on Friday, February 3, 2012. Librarians, lawyers, law students and researchers are encouraged to attend.
Program Details
How to Conduct FREE Legal Research Online
Friday, February 3, 2012
10:00 am to 11:30 am
Royal Sonesta Hotel, Fleur de Lis A, Lobby Level
This program will focus on the legal research services and resources available from the Law Library of Congress and other free online collections. Following a general overview of the Law Library and its services, there will be an explanation of the organization, structure and content of the two leading websites maintained by the Law Library—THOMAS, covering federal legislative information beginning with the 104th Congress (1995) with full texts of bills, resolutions, the Congressional Record, legislative calendars, committee information, treaties plus much more! Learn about the Law Library's global research services, vast collections in 195 languages from over 220 jurisdictions worldwide, and expert legal staff from Matthew Braun, Legal Reference Specialist at the Law Library of Congress. Expert legal researchers will also highlight other free online collections and search engines to equip participants with reliable sources for legal research.
Learning Outcomes:
- Familiarity with the specialized services, websites, collections and expert legal research staff available from the Law Library of Congress free to all including solos, practicing lawyers, librarians, researchers and those new to the profession;
- Understanding of the organization, structure, content, and search strategies to perform time‐saving legal research in THOMAS and other free legal databases from your own computer wherever you are in the world; and
- Interactive research demonstrations and explanations of websites and other research products produced and maintained by the Law Library of Congress as well as other authoritative Web‐based collections and useful search engines.
Speaker: Matthew Braun, Legal Reference Specialist, Law Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Download the Program Announcement.
Monday, July 11, 2011
ABA Technology Survey Results
iPhone J.D.
July 11, 2011
2011 ABA Technology Survey suggests around 300,000 U.S. lawyers use an iPhone, around 130,000 use an iPad
Every year, the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center conducts a survey to gauge attorney use of legal technology. Continuing the trend that the ABA saw in last year's report (which I discussed here), this year's survey reveals that the number of lawyers using smartphones continues to increase. And for the first time, the survey tells us something about the number of lawyers using iPhones. (cont)
Friday, February 11, 2011
New look for the American Bar Association web site
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
ABA Report on US News and World Report Rankings
July 15, 2010(cont)
Report of the Special Committee on the U.S. News and World Report Rankings
Section on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar
Hon. Martha Daughtrey (United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit); Tracy Giles (Giles & Lambert); Dean Phoebe Haddon (University of Maryland School of Law); Pauline A. Schneider (Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe); Dean Kent Syverud (Washington University School of Law)(chair).
On February 17, 2010, ABA President Carolyn Lamm asked the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar to examine rankings of law schools. She did so to follow through on a Resolution of the ABA House of Delegates that the ABA “examine any efforts to publish national, state, territorial, and local rankings of law firms and law schools.” American law schools have many years of experience with rankings, and the Section on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, under chair Jerome C. Hafter, has endeavored to help the ABA leadership and the House of Delegates to benefit from that experience – particularly as that experience may predict how new rankings might affect law firms and the legal profession. To that end, Mr. Hafter appointed this special committee of members of the Council of the Section to report on the history and impact of rankings of American law schools.
Related article from law.com :
New 'U.S. News' Law Firm Rankings: News You Can't Use?
Steven Harper
The American Lawyer
August 10, 2010
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
ABA Journal online
Friday, November 30, 2007
Vote for Your Favorite Blawg
From the ABA Journal
Choose from 100 different law blogs.
http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/aba_journal_blawg_100
Here's the voting link:
http://www.abajournal.com/blawgs/blawg100
I see some of my favs are on here: Ernie the Attorney, Above the Law, etc.
Voting ends Jan. 2.
Wow, ABA, where's the law librarian blogs?